We are currently exploring light as resource and how we can manipulate it and incorporate it into a dance piece. I am working in a group with two other people and we are creating a study using stillness and light. Only one movement can be seen, ie we are only allowed to move within total darkness.
The easiest source of light we were able to use and manipulate is a normal desk lamp. We also examined the use of sounds that the lamp created when being switched on, bent etc.
As you can see, the desk lamp has quite a wide circuferance of visibility, depending on how far the bulb is from whatever is being lit. We chose to use closeness and focus on points of a body and use the light to investigate the shapes we can make using just one light source and a still person.
My answer ~ No. I think, knowing that I like those classic, traditional works that this is of course completely different to what we are doing at the moment. I like working with the lights, however, and I feel this is a good stimulus for a dance piece. Doing this task has widened my mind about the uses of light and reminded me to think about all possibilities, not just the obvious ones.
I'm actually a bit surprised that I asked this question!
ReplyDeleteSo, at what point does it become dance?
Nijinsky's Le Sacre du Printemps or L'après-midi d'un faune were both derided as not being 'dance' and yet they still exist in the repertoire of many companies. When did they start becoming 'dance'? Is it important to categorise such things? And why limit yourself to "those classic, traditional works" - particular when so much work is presented that borders many different dance and art genres?